What is an AI acceptable use policy?
It is a document that sets out how employees or customers of a Singapore business are allowed to use AI tools, including what data can be entered and what outputs cannot be used for.
Data, Privacy & Compliance
Generate an AI acceptable use policy setting rules for staff or customers using AI tools, aligned with the Personal Data Protection Act and the Model AI Governance Framework.
Create an AI acceptable use policy for [Company Name] employees covering approved AI tools, permitted use cases, and personal or confidential data that must not be entered into AI systems, consistent with the PDPA.
Create an AI acceptable use policy for customers of [Product Name], an AI-powered product operated by [Company Name], covering prohibited uses, content restrictions, and liability limitations.
Create an AI acceptable use policy for [Company Name] covering the use of AI tools to generate marketing, creative, or written content, including disclosure and human review requirements.
An AI acceptable use policy sets out how employees or customers are allowed to use AI tools, including what data can be entered and what outputs cannot be used for. This free Singapore AI acceptable use policy generator produces internal staff policies and customer-facing AI product policies, reflecting Singapore's approach of regulating AI use through the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and the non-binding Model AI Governance Framework issued by IMDA and the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC). It is designed for Singapore businesses rolling out AI tools internally, and for technology companies embedding AI into a customer-facing product. The generator lets you list approved tools, restrict the data that may be entered, require human review of AI output, and set consequences for misuse. Use it to reduce the legal and reputational risk of staff or customers relying on AI tools without clear guardrails.
It is a document that sets out how employees or customers of a Singapore business are allowed to use AI tools, including what data can be entered and what outputs cannot be used for.
Without clear rules, employees may enter personal data into public AI tools in a way that is inconsistent with the PDPA, or rely on inaccurate AI output for important decisions, creating legal and reputational risk.
It should list approved tools, prohibited data types such as customer personal data or trade secrets, review requirements for AI output, and consequences for misuse.
Yes. An internal policy governs staff behaviour. A customer-facing policy governs how customers may use an AI product you offer, including prohibited uses and liability limits.
Yes. It should make clear that AI output can be inaccurate or biased and must be checked before being relied upon, especially for legal, medical, or financial matters.
No. Singapore regulates AI use primarily through the PDPA and the non-binding Model AI Governance Framework issued by IMDA and PDPC, rather than a standalone AI statute.